Has the Trump administration driven new leasing highs in Wyoming oil and gas?

By Heather Richards

Casper Star-Tribune

Via Wyoming News Exchange

CASPER — In September, companies spent a jaw-dropping $1 billion at a lease sale in New Mexico for potential oil and gas development along the state’s eastern border, where the Permian spills over from West Texas.

The sale was the largest under the Trump administration, which has pushed a pro-business platform since taking over in 2017. Sales in Wyoming, meanwhile, have set more modest records, but operators in the Equality State have certainly had a pro-industry story to tell that is at least partially attributable to a friendly administration in Washington.

More than $100 million in a single lease sale in the Powder River Basin in early 2017 turned heads, and an 800 percent increase in oil and gas revenue from 2016 to 2017 did, too.

Both industry and conservation groups have marked the significance, for good or ill, of broadening federal lease sales in Wyoming. These are land auctions that give oil and gas companies the opportunity to compete for rights to develop on federal land.

But whether leasing is spreading rapidly across public acres in Wyoming is up for debate.

Conservation groups note that leasing has taken off, that thousands of acres are up for bid each quarter and many of those parcels overlap with protected habitats. Oil and gas firms say the environment under President Donald Trump has improved for leasing after being stymied by the last administration, but that overall, leases haven’t skyrocketed as has been assumed.

So who’s right?

Well, both.

Last year, Wyoming experienced the highest number of acres leased to oil and gas – on federal land – since 2008, according to Bureau of Land Management records. But 2017 was on par with the Obama years, and even 2018 falls below historic highs.

Conservation groups have been concerned for about two years, from the time when Trump took office, that the energy dominance rhetoric from the new president was a risk to environmental issues, starting largely with protections around Wyoming’s sage grouse. The bird, which can get a big larger than a plump chicken, struts and mates across Wyoming. It’s also a bit of a bellwether species. Its population declines reflect damage and fragmentation of the sagebrush seas that cross multiple western states.

Changes to this protection on federal lands drew incredible attention from diverse environmental groups. And part of those changes has to do with leasing – auctioning sage grouse habitat to oil and gas firms.

Leasing concerns extended to other wildlife issues, such as parcels of land that overlap with Wyoming’s first designated mule deer corridor, the 140-mile Red Desert to Hoback route, or the more than 500,000 acres leased in a March oil and gas sale in the sage grouse habitat’s Golden Triangle – an area near Lander that’s known as one of the most valuable regions for the birds in the country.

Those in favor of Wyoming’s approach to leasing in the sage grouse’s domain note that leasing carries restrictions on drilling in Wyoming, while opponents note that leases are property rights that risk the protected status of those areas.

Where oil and gas gets a stake is a matter of contention for some groups.

“It’s not so much the acreage. It’s where they are leasing,” said Dustin Bleizeffer, spokesman for the Wyoming Outdoor Council and a former energy journalist in Wyoming. “That’s the big one. It’s where.”

Additionally, it’s how, he said.

The Bureau of Land Management has made some changes to its leasing process, such as offering statewide sales four times a year instead of regional sales throughout the year, which may have increased acres. BLM has also paired back public input in what is leased or drilled on public land — to some groups’ frustration.

“It’s the manner in which it’s being leased. Just a rush passed public input and a severe lack of following process and agreements,” Bleizeffer said.

This change of tone and practice, and the administration’s attempts to encourage energy, is chartable outside of the environmental sector perspective, watchers say.

“They are trying to have it both ways,” Chuck Mason, an economist at the University of Wyoming, said of the new approach under the Trump administration. “They really did do things to make it easier for oil and gas companies to get in. That’s not fake.”

The political climate prior to the 2016 election affected producers as well, when the national narrative assumed the new president would not be a pro-energy Trump, he said. A similar attitude may have influenced decisions ahead of the midterm elections of 2018.

Their reasoning was strategic. Developers are not just looking at where to lease or drill, but when, he said.

“If I think things are going to dry up in a couple years I am going to bid acres now,” he said. “There were people thinking, ‘Maybe we better get it now while the getting is good.’”

But going into the midterm elections, Mason said industry interest had less to do with the Trump administration’s promotion of energy dominance than anticipation that things may not go in industry’s favor.

There were other, less political influences on leasing in recent years

The first quarter sale of 2017, the big one that had a number in industry and outside expecting high lease sales to continue, was the first online bidding system used by the BLM in Wyoming. That may have encouraged more bidders and more competition per parcel, particularly on certain tracks of land in the Powder River Basin.

Though the income from that 2017 event was not repeated in subsequent sales, the revenue story was positive. The overall income from online auctions that year – on combined federal and state land – rose by 800 percent in Wyoming.

Total acres leased, however, were not dramatically different. Two years ago, 247,517 federal acres were leased to oil and gas companies in Wyoming, compared to 227,904 the previous year and 329,982 in 2015.

It wasn’t until 2018 that acreage leased to industry really jumped. And even then, much larger sales have taken place historically in Wyoming.

Though there are some discrepancies in available data, Wyoming leasing would take place on millions of acres in the 1980s and 1990s.

Bleizeffer, of the Wyoming Outdoor Council, said there were a host of reasons for those big sales years ago.

Restrictions were lighter in the ‘80s and early ‘90s, for example, when more than 1 million acres of Wyoming land would go to industry in a single year, he said.

“Prior to the 1990s, just about everything was open for leasing,” he said. “About the only thing that was off limits were Wilderness Study Areas.”

Other factors included the coal bed methane prospectors in the norther PRB during the 2000s, who were leasing anywhere there was coal and the administration of George W. Bush.

“It was drill, baby, drill,” Bleizeffer said. “That big push lasted until about 2008.”

Some in industry argue that the early lease sales under the Trump administration reveal pent up demand from industry, a frustrated desire to stake claims after the leasing delays and deferrals of the Obama years.

Leased acres in Wyoming are proposed by industry and decided on by the BLM before being offered at auction. The number of acres proposed by oil and gas firms over the last 10 years as ebbed and flowed, from a low in 2011 of 374,629 acres proposed to a high of 1.7 million acres suggested in 2008.